Seven Days in the Art World

Having ‘slept on’ my thoughts about this session, sadly yesterday’s audio wrap-up comment about my ambivalence still stands this morning.

Sarah Thornton is an amazing speaker and clearly an incredibly intelligent and talented writer, and I remain committed to reading her book (it’s in my suitcase right now).  However, I really did find the session hard-going.  Granted, it was at the end of a long and busy day, and as I said, I have not yet read the book.

However, this shouldn’t have made any difference – you can never assume that a festival audience is as heavily invested in a work as you are, or that they know and recognise every name and artwork and quotation you are offering.  This is not, by the way, a criticism of Sarah Thornton, but rather of the chair who, somewhat ironically, I thought, perfectly illustrated some of John Carey’s comments from the What Good Are the Arts? session.

I guess all I can offer from this session is the comment that for those who do move within those fabled ‘art circles’, it would have been hog heaven.  And there were those in the audience who clearly do, and are, and were.  For the rest of us, I think, though, it was a little like being thrown into a combination dictionary/encyclopedia/phone book.

I am not unintelligent, not badly-read, and not without an openness to discovering new things and learning new ideas.  But there is no point of entry if you have no idea who these people are, what they do, and why they said what they did.  And surely the point of a public festival session such as this is to make more people more invested in reading, expanding horizons, and discovering newer and deeper ways of appreciating the arts, rather than leaving us adrift on a sea of name-dropping and intellectual show-off-ism.

I’m now hiding under the bed, waiting for the intellectual wolves to start pounding at my door and climbing down my chimney.  Oh, and I’d also be really keen to hear from anyone else who was at the session and who may have had a different experience of it. Anyone?

One thought on “Seven Days in the Art World

  1. Jane 18 May 2010 / 11:04 am

    It’s not always an easy thing to admit that something has left you feeling somewhat perplexed, so good on you Bronnypop. I imagine some are thinking that your comments show a desire for the ‘dumbing’ down of festival sessions – lets speak to the lowest common denominator, (and I’m not saying that’s you by the way, even if you do show unnatural affinties to zombies…), and that this leads to a lack of true ‘intellectual discourse’. (For some reason when I write on this subject I have to use inverted commas, very strange). Anyway, I believe if authors and presenters are wanting people to join in discussions, then it is important to present their ideas in a way that is coherant and understandable, and leads people to think more, as opposed to being left feeling rather stupid and out of their depth. It seems to me that because this session has left you feeling baffled and annoyed that the whole point of what the session was actually about has been lost, and that is a pity.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s